A (des)valorização social do SUS e os aspectos relacionados

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53843/bms.v8i11.464

Keywords:

Sistema Único de Saúde, Saúde Pública, Serviços de Atendimento

Abstract

Introduction: The SUS - Unified Health System - enabled profound changes in the health scenario, guaranteeing access to sectors not included in the previous regime, however, although some services have a prominent position worldwide, others still face several difficulties. In this sense, this article aims to analyze the satisfaction of SUS users and explore its reflexes in the valorization of the System. Methodology: This is a narrative review study covering published articles and studies, for which searches were carried out in the PubMed databases and in the CAPES Periodicals Portal, using descriptors such as "Brazil", "Consumer Behavior", "Health Evaluation”, “Patient Preference”, “Patient Satisfaction”, “Perception”, “Satisfaction”, “SUS”, “User”, “Unified Health System”, “User Perception AND Unified Health System”, “Sistema Único de Saúde” Health AND Patient Satisfaction, “SUS AND User Perception” and “SUS AND Valuation”. Results: After analysis, it was observed that user dissatisfaction with the services provided by the SUS varies according to the region of the country, social class and perception of their own health status. In addition, 57.9% of users listed the lack of doctors as the biggest general problem. Discussion: It was possible to analyze that the Unified Health System, in part, managed to offer health services in an integral and universal way. However, despite important achievements, problems still persist such as: long waiting time for care, lack of humanization in the work of professionals, among others. Added to these problems, the lack of knowledge about the SUS contributes decisively to the devaluation on the part of the user. Conclusion: In this way, there was a general dissatisfaction of users with the system, which, along with the population's misinformation about SUS actions and the partial performance of the media, generate an impact on society's view of the health system, leading to its devaluation.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Santos NR. SUS 30 anos: o início, a caminhada e o rumo. Ciência e Saúde Coletiva 2018; 23 (6): 1729-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018236.06092018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232018236.06092018

Gouveia GC, Souza WV, Luna CF, Souza-Júnior PRB, Szwarcwald CL Health care users’ satisfaction in Brazil, 2003. Cad. Saúde Pública [online]. 2005; 21(1):109-118. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000700012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2005000700012

Esperidião MA, Trad LAB. Avaliação de satisfação de usuários: considerações teórico-conceituais. Cadernos de Saúde Pública [online]. 2006; 22 (6): 1267-76. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2006000600016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2006000600016

Protasio APL, Gomes, LB, Machado LS, Valença, AMG. Satisfação do usuário da Atenção Básica em Saúde por regiões do Brasil: 1º ciclo de avaliação externa do PMAQ-AB. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva [online]. 2017; 22 (6): 1829-1844. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017226.26472015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017226.26472015

Lavor A, Dominquez B, Machado K. O SUS que não se vê. RADIS. 2011 Abr; 104 (1): 9-17

Oliveira VC. A comunicação midiática e o Sistema Único de Saúde. Interface - Comunicação, Saúde, Educação [online]. 2000; 4 (7): 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832000000200006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832000000200006

Donabedian A, White KL Evaluación de la calidad de la atención médica. Investigaciones sobre servicios de salud: una antología. Washington DC: Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS. Publicación Científica, 534). 1992; 534(1): 382-404

Bastos GAN, Fasolo LR. Fatores que influenciam a satisfação do paciente ambulatorial em uma população de baixa renda: um estudo de base populacional. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia [online]. 2013; 16 (1): 114-124. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2013000100011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2013000100011

Santos SR, Lacerda, MCN. Fatores de satisfação e insatisfação entre os pacientes assistidos pelo SUS. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem [online]. 1999; 52 (1): 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71671999000100006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-71671999000100006

Silva Júnior JB, Ramalho WM. Cenário Epidemiológico do Brasil em 2033: uma prospecção sobre as próximas duas décadas. In: Noronha JC, Lima, LD, Chorny AH, Dal Poz MR, Gadelha P, eds. Brasil Saúde Amanhã: dimensões para o planejamento da atenção à saúde [online]. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ, 2017, p. 31-62. https://doi.org/10.7476/9786557080900.0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7476/9786557080900.0003

IPEA - INSTITUTO DE PESQUISA ECONÔMICA APLICADA. Sistema de Indicadores de Percepção Social (SIPS) [internet]. Brasília: Ipea, 2011 [cited 2022 oct 19]. Available from: http://repositorio.ipea.gov.br/bitstream/11058/3097/1/Livro_Sistema%20de%20indicadores%20de%20percep%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20social%20%28SIPS%29_1%20ed.pdf

Fonseca GS, Paulino TSC, Morais IF, Valença CN, Germano RM. Percepção de usuários e profissionais de saúde sobre o sistema único de saúde no município de Santa Cruz-RN. Rev Bras. Promoção da Saúde [online]. 2013; 25(4): 455-461. https://doi.org/10.5020/2548 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5020/18061230.2012.p455

Narvai. PC. Centro Brasileiro de Estudos de Saúde [internet]. [place unknown]: CEBES; c.2015. (cited 2022 Oct 19). Available from: https://cebes.org.br/querem-matar-o-sus-cpsus-neles/17296/

Published

31.05.2023

How to Cite

1.
Duarte Jorge Ígor G, Rodrigues dos Santos TF, Takayuki Aguena Yasunaka R, da Silva Damião JP, Dossi de Guimarães e Queiroz AP. A (des)valorização social do SUS e os aspectos relacionados. BMS [Internet]. 2023 May 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];8(11). Available from: https://bms.ifmsabrazil.org/index.php/bms/article/view/464