PUBLICALUNO: Um relato de experiência

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53843/bms.v7i10.58

Keywords:

Evidence-Based Medicine, Methodology, Periodical

Abstract

The teaching of scientific methodology and research preparation are essential for the training of health academics, since reading scientific articles is the main way to update medical knowledge today. However, this teaching is deficient in many educational institutions in the country, which discourages the reading of articles by health academics, as well as reduces their interest in producing scientific productions. This reiterates the importance of a methodological scientific approach outside the institutional framework. REPORT: A Journey of scientific publication was held through the Youtube platform, distributing the topics covered in eleven days of lectures. The event began in October and ended in November. Among the topics covered, we can mention the preparation of literature reviews, critical reading of scientific evidence, preparation of experimental studies, preparation of case reports and experience reports, how to submit to the Ethics Committee and in journals. Of the eleven lectures, ten were broadcast live and all made it possible to answer the listeners' doubts through a referral to the speaker via form and via email. The Journey aimed to promote the teaching of scientific methodology and stimulate the publication of research by academics. DISCUSSION: The scientific methodology is of paramount importance for the provision of skills necessary for the success of students as professionals and for the development of students' reflective critical thinking. In this sense, the availability of the course to health students is a way to enable the critical reading of scientific publications and stimulate publication. CONCLUSION: The "Publicaluno" event distributed the themes gradually and sought to sequence the stages of production with the days of lectures, and we considered that at the end of the event, we obtained satisfactory results of the participants taking advantage of the lectures given the answers on the impact forms.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Brito JD, Escobar JS, Urizar C, Ayala JN. Perception about university training in medical research: A Latin American study. An la Fac Ciencias Médicas. 2020;53(2):47–52.

Cardoso GP, Silva Junior CT, Martinho JMDSG, Cyrillo RJT. Iniciação científica em medicina: uma questão de interesse para todas as especialidades. Pulmão. 2004;13(1):8–12. [acesso em 15 abr 2021]. Disponível em: https://rbmfc.org.br/rbmfc/article/view/411/374

Maia RT. A importância da disciplina de metodologia científica no desenvolvimento de produções acadêmicas de qualidade no nível superior. Rev Urutágua [Internet]. 2008;(14):1–9. [acesso em 08 mai 2021]. Disponível em: http://www.urutagua.uem.br/014/14maia.htm

Severino AJ. Metodologia do trabalho científico. São Paulo: Cortez Editora; 2017. 321 p. [acesso em 07 mai 2021]. Disponível em: https://www.ufrb.edu.br/ccaab/images/AEPE/Divulgação/LIVROS/Metodologia_do_Trabalho_Cient%C3%ADfico_-_1a_Edição_ _Antonio_Joaquim_Severino_-_2014.pdf

Santos A. A importância da metodologia científica para estudantes no contexto universitário [Internet]. 2018. [acesso em 06 mai 2021]. Disponível em: https://meuartigo.brasilescola.uol.com.br/educacao/importancia-metodologiacientifica-para-estudantescontexto-universitarios.htm

Texeira E. As três metodologias: acadêmica, da ciência e da pesquisa. Editora Vozes; 2010. 104p. [acesso em 08 mai 2021]. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufv.br/RPV/article/view/10811

Salomon DV. Como fazer uma monografia. 12 ed. Brasil: WWF Martins Fontes; 2014. 432p.

Published

19.10.2021

How to Cite

1.
Gomes Miranda A, Louise Carvalho Barbosa Barros I, Mazza Malta L, Brandão Cardoso Paz I, Gomes Veiga D, Rodrigue Santos K. PUBLICALUNO: Um relato de experiência. BMS [Internet]. 2021 Oct. 19 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];7(10). Available from: https://bms.ifmsabrazil.org/index.php/bms/article/view/58